Digitizd
  • Categories
    • Apps
    • Fun
    • Gadgets
    • Reviews
    • Archive
    • Community
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Tweet

    8 Reasons Grooveshark's Better than Pandora

    Posted on September 8, 2008 by David Pierce David Pierce | 85 Comments

    Pandora is one of the best and most-used Internet radios out there, and does its thing really well. For me, it’s a really useful study tool- type in Hans Zimmer, rock out to some movie soundtracks. Somehow, listening to the Last of the Mohicans while I read makes everything more intense. But I digress.

    Internet radio like Pandora works exactly as does in-car radio, except that you decide where you start. You pick a song, or an album, that you like, and Pandora tries to figure out what other songs you might like. It creates a playlist of music similar to the one you chose, and plays them all for you. You choose whether you like them or not, create more stations, and help Pandora figure out how to make your music better.

    Pandora’s good, but it’s not the king of the castle anymore. When Grooveshark, previously a downloading service, launched Autoplay, it totally outstripped Pandora. Here’s why:

    1. It does everything Pandora does.

    This is worth noting- there’s nothing important that Pandora does that Grooveshark doesn’t do. You pick a song or an artist, and Grooveshark plays songs similar to the one you chose. Choices were relatively similar between the two, and even had similar interfaces for many things. You choose whether you like or dislike the song with a thumbs up or down. You move through a cover flow-like interface, and you can bookmark or favorite songs. The basic tenet of the two are essentially the same, so the little things are really where the comparisons lie.

    2. It’s the radio, or a jukebox.

    Grooveshark was initially an app that would let you create playlists song-by-song. Search for a song, and then add it to a playlist, which you can save, or the queue, which you can’t save. It creates an ad-hoc listening session, which is great in and of itself. Then, with Autoplay, Grooveshark added the radio feature, where it decides for you what songs to play next. You pick a song or artist, and Grooveshark plays songs it thinks you’ll like. Both of those services work well, and make for a great experience using the Internet radio, regardless of which way you choose to do it.

    3. You can skip all the songs you like.

    If you don’t like a song, skip it. If you don’t like 13 in a row, skip all 13. Pandora imposes limits on the songs you can skip every hour, but Grooveshark has no such thing. Skip to your heart’s delight. Plus, if you like a song, play it as much as you’d like. With Pandora, when a song ends, it ends. With Grooveshark, though, you can play a song as many times as you want- if you’re into a particular song, play it over and over.

    4. It starts with the song you wanted.

    On Pandora, if I search for “Home” by Michael Buble, the first song I get isn’t that one. It’s a similar one, which is fine, but not what I was looking for. If I want to hear “Home,” the way to do it is go to Grooveshark. It begins with the song, artist or album you chose, and then goes from there. It’s something I never paid attention to on Pandora, but is a big plus for Grooveshark.

    5. You can play whole albums or artists.

    If you want to listen to an entire album of your main man Jimmy Buffett, or listen only to Hanson for hours on end, Pandora doesn’t give you a way to do that. Grooveshark does. Search for an artist, select them, and then on the right side click the play button. It will add up to 200 songs by that artist, or the entire album, to your playlist. Great for trying before you buy with albums, or just if you’re in the mood for a particular artist.

    6. You can listen to popular music.

    On the front page of Grooveshark, there’s a link to “Popular.” It shows you the most popular music out there, mirroring the Billboard charts beautifully. Listen to the popular music, and it becomes essentially a Top-40 radio station. Want to hear about how Katy Perry kissed a girl, and wondering how she felt about it? Check it out here, and then click “popular”.

    7. It works better.

    Grooveshark’s interface just looks better. The whole user experience is easier, mirroring more closely a desktop player like Windows Media Player. View lists of songs, related songs, and all the options for your search results on one page. You can also listen to music and search for more at the same time, which is a huge plus. Pandora tends to limit you to single-tasking, while Grooveshark does a better job of letting you stay a musical step ahead of yourself.

    8. It’s faster.

    Grooveshark’s search is faster, the songs load faster, the whole site works more easily. Pandora frequently gives me long loads between songs, and Grooveshark almost never does. Waiting between songs is a pain, and Grooveshark doesn’t make me do it. That’s a big deal.

    Though I’m a big Pandora fan, and don’t have a lot of bad things to say about it, but Grooveshark outdoes it in enough ways that it’s taken over. In an already crowded market, Grooveshark just about booted the rest of them out.

    Related Posts:

    • Why I paid for Grooveshark
    • Factotum Controls Your Music, Wherever It’s Playing
    • 5 Apps Bringing The Future Of Music
    • Spotify's Jukebox Problem
    • RCRDLBL, Groupon for Music
    About the author: David Pierce (1175 Posts)

    David Pierce, the founder of Digitizd, is now Reviews Editor at The Verge.


    Posted in Apps, Features | Tagged Apps, Bookmarks, Grooveshark, Listen, Music, Online, Pandora, Radio, Stream | 85 Replies
    Tweet

    85 thoughts on “8 Reasons Grooveshark's Better than Pandora”

    Comment navigation

    ← Older Comments
    1. Anonymous on May 9, 2011 at 7:57 pm said:

      Grooveshark is really only a good substitute for quick music access via YouTube, and its only better than Pandora for having unlimited skips and (mostly) no audio ads. But it sucks at everything else.

      -The global library is polluted with duplicates, incomplete albums, and very poor quality uploaded tracks.

      -Custom radio is a pain to start up, and the variety is horrible- it repeats tracks constantly (bad music discovery)

      -Music social networking isn’t tied together (bad music discovery)

      -Tracks in large playlists duplicate wildly.

      -The Favorites system sucks, and the “recently played” list is gone.

      After struggling for some time at enjoying GS with a membership I went back to iTunes. It has a more advanced learning curve, but is just a huge pleasure to use compared with ANYTHING else.

      Reply ↓
    2. Mooka on July 10, 2011 at 11:50 pm said:

      Similar to Grooveshark:

      http://discoverbit.com/ 

      Reply ↓
    3. Anonymous on September 4, 2011 at 4:38 pm said:

      9 IT WORKS WORLDWIDE!! For free!

      Reply ↓
    4. Anonymous on September 4, 2011 at 4:38 pm said:

      9 IT WORKS WORLDWIDE!! For free!

      Reply ↓
    5. Darkzero2005 on September 10, 2011 at 2:24 pm said:

      grooveshark is nice

      Reply ↓
    6. Anonymous on September 11, 2011 at 12:43 pm said:

      I prefer Grooveshark to Pandora, primarily for the ability to create my own playlists.  But the added Radio feature is nice to have.  iHeart Radio is now coming out with a similar app – as for skipping songs, it (iHeart Radio) is worse than Pandora.  It only allows you to skip 5 songs.  When I ‘disliked’ a song, it said that song would never play again, however it played 4 songs later.

      Reply ↓
    7. Anonymous on September 11, 2011 at 12:56 pm said:

      Is there an Android App for Grooveshark?  If so, haven’t found it yet.

      Reply ↓
    8. Anonymous on September 11, 2011 at 12:56 pm said:

      Is there an Android App for Grooveshark?  If so, haven’t found it yet.

      Reply ↓
      • David Pierce on September 13, 2011 at 12:38 pm said:

        There is an app, but you can’t get it from the Market – got pulled for some reason. You can get it here: http://mobile.grooveshark.com/android

        Reply ↓
    9. Anonymous on January 26, 2012 at 11:46 pm said:

      One reason Grooveshark totally sucks.  I put in Pink Floyd, and The Who and Grooveshark couldn’t find music for either artist!!  Wow, lame.

      Reply ↓
    10. Anonymouse on February 19, 2013 at 10:21 am said:

      I really, really dislike Grooveshark’s radio. The ‘similar’ songs actually sound horrible and are nothing like the song I picked. I find myself using Pandora to find similar songs to add to Grooveshark, forcing me to create my own playlist radio.

      Reply ↓

    Comment navigation

    ← Older Comments

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe

RSS | Email | Facebook | Twitter

Follow @Digitizd

Search Digitizd

Contributors

Adam Thompson
Content Manager
View Posts

Chris Poindexter
Writer
View Posts

David Pierce
Founder
View Posts

Recent Posts

  • Investors React To Yahoo’s Purchase Of Tumblr
  • Google Introduces New Services And Features At I/O Conference
  • Windows Blue Will Be Free Update
  • HTC First Destined For Slag Heap Of History
  • Linux Takes Over International Space Station

RSS Community Posts

  • Mobile Impact: The Future of Service Desks
  • How to Get a Job in the IT Sector
  • Electronics Companies Impacted by Bankruptcy
  • Digital Technology, a Growing Aspect of GSA Contracts
  • Just How Dangerous is Sitting at Your Computer?
  • Why Choose the Google Nexus 10 over Apple’s iPad?
  • Monitoring Data to Analyze Customer Satisfaction
  • Causes and Consequences of Permissions Change on a MAC Machine
  • 5 Kitchen Gadgets Every Man Should Own
  • [Infographic] 15 Gadgets That Failed