The Value of Copying

Everything is a Remix is a wonderful, wonderful video series, and the third episode is my favorite. It’s all about ideas: Where ideas come from, what’s right about copying them, how improvement comes from blatant copying, and why Hunter S. Thompson re-typed The Great Gatsby. Well worth the 11-minute watch.

Excellent related reading: Jonah Lehrer on Basketball and Jazz, and why the seeming randomness of each isn’t as easy, or as random, as you think.

(Via Jason Kottke)

You Can't Hide From the Internet

Brian Stelter warns that no matter what you do, or who you are, two things are probably true: You’re being documented somewhere, and it’ll get back to you:

Women who were online pen pals of former Representative Anthony D. Weiner similarly learned how quickly Internet users can sniff out all the details of a person’s online life. So did the men who set fire to cars and looted stores in the wake of Vancouver’s Stanley Cup defeat last week when they were identified, tagged by acquaintances online.

The collective intelligence of the Internet’s two billion users, and the digital fingerprints that so many users leave on Web sites, combine to make it more and more likely that every embarrassing video, every intimate photo, and every indelicate e-mail is attributed to its source, whether that source wants it to be or not. This intelligence makes the public sphere more public than ever before and sometimes forces personal lives into public view.

Whether it’s Anthony Weiner, the kissing couple during the Vancouver riots, or just some random lady on the subway, there’s no hiding from the Internet. Everything we do is in public, and "public" is a much broader term today, thanks to the Internet.

The Actual Best-Selling Self Publisher

I got all pithy with my headline yesterday, only to be factually proven wrong by John Locke (neither thinker nor Lost character, though I suspect they’d both prove me wrong on some things). This John Locke is the author of books like Vegas Moon, Wish List, and Saving Rachel. He’s a New York Times bestseller, and doesn’t have a publisher, an agent, or a book deal to speak of. He’s also the first self-published author to sell a million ebooks, says ReadWriteWeb:

Rather than being published by major publishing house – and all the perks that have long been associated with that (marketing, book tours, prime shelf space in retail stores) – Locke has sold 1,010,370 Kindle books (as of yesterday) having used Kindle Direct Publishing to get his e-books into the Amazon store. No major publisher. No major marketing.

Locke writes primarily crime and adventure stories, including Vegas Moon, Wish List, and the New York Times E-Book Bestseller, Saving Rachel. Most of the e-books sell for $.99, and he says he makes 35 cents on every sale. That sort of per book profit is something that authors would never get from a traditional book deal.

Some Things You Can't Google

Susean Orlean, at the New Yorker, takes note of a study that shows students have essentially no knowledge of history. And that’s a problem, she says, but not because knowing when the Civil War started has any value by itself:

So what to make of the news that American students are terrible at history? Unfortunately, this is of the very worrying sort of deficiency, not the you-can-just-Google-it sort. Most fourth graders can’t say why Abraham Lincoln is an important historical figure? Wow. This is far more distressing than if the news had been that fourth graders were bad at reciting multiplication tables, because you can, in fact, Google that. Like teaching cursive writing—which many schools are abandoning—memorizing things that can be easily figured out or looked up sometimes seems a little pointless, except that some neurons are probably engaged each time you plug information into your brain. Being able to reel off a list of dates in history, while useful, is so much less important than understanding why those dates matter, or understanding enough about the way civilization has developed to be able to figure things out from what you already know.

(Via Andrew Sullivan)

Logging On for the First Time

Derek Powazek, one of those guys who’s been on the Internet since before it was even a thing, and has been involved in about 40,000 things you’ve heard of but didn’t know he was involved in, has a new project. It’s called On the Network, and it started with a ten point manifesto counteracting how dumb people (and by people I mean the media) are about the Internet. As part of the project, he’s asked people to describe their first Internet moment. Here’s Alexis Madrigal, from the Atlantic:

I was sitting in rural Washington state, where I grew up in a year like 1994. We’d probably gotten the Internet through our old ISP Pacifier the year or two before, and I’d slowly started using it instead of dialing into the BBS’ I’d gotten into in ’92. In any case, I had some question about microbiology. I don’t even really remember what it was. The Internet! It could tell me the answer, I was sure. So, I dialed in, waited through the pops and hisses until our 14.4 baud modem connected, fired up Netscape, went to Yahoo, and typed in something like, “microbiology.” Up came Jack Brown’s webpage at the University of Kansas. Brown was a molecular biology professor who maintained a fairly extensive set of resources about various sciencey things including his “What the heck is…?” series. Most of it is still online. After reading through his work, I emailed him my question, probably beginning like, “Hello, my name is Alex Madrigal and I’m a sixth grader at Union Ridge Elementary School, home of the Tater Tots…” Or whatever.

A few minutes later, Brown fired back a response and we struck up a correspondence that lasted for a long time, years, IIRC. We were both big college basketball fans. He rooted for the Jayhawks, obviously, and I was (and remain) a huge UCLA Bruin fan. Brown became my first Internet friend.

This is going to be a fun thing to follow, but I promise to try my best to not post 8,000 times about it.

Why Passwords Are Broken

Mat Honan, one of Planet Earth’s smarter and better writers, is ready to kill off passwords. He explains why, ending here:

The most common idea you see today in terms of protecting yourself is to use unique passwords on every site. The only way to really do this, of course, is to either create a password scheme, or to use a password generating and tracking program like 1Password. But these should be stopgaps.

What we really need is an entirely new way to prove our identities on the Web. Google’s two factor authentication is a step in the right direction, but it’s a pain in the ass and most people probably won’t take the trouble to set it up unless they’re forced to do so. Ideas like biometric logins, or proving identity within the browser itself are out there, but they’re still pie in the sky and nobody is moving towards widespread implementation yet.

Facebook Means You're Never Alone

And never being alone was a good thing for Joel Mathis, as he endured surgery and its aftermath:

So I wrote about the food. I wrote about the bad TV. I wrote about peeing into a bottle. Because I’m a nice guy, I did not post pictures of my surgical wounds.

“Got moved in with a roommate today,” I wrote two days after the surgery. “He’s staying up late watching sports. Feels like a summer camp without colons.”

Or, more pathetically, after a particularly rough day: “I can’t joke or even be cheerfully defiant about the series of procedures I’ve been through in the last 24 hours. Right now I feel broken and I just wanna cry.”

People kept responding, with encouragement, with jokes, with promises of prayer, with other comforting comments—even with “likes” on my Facebook status. All of this told me I wasn’t alone, that people cared about me, that they were interested in my welfare. That was absolutely what I needed.

(Via Steve Rubel)

Jack Dorsey on the Future of Money

In the current issue of Wired, Jack Dorsey, founder of both Twitter and Square, talked about his move from Twitter into the money industry. Square, his newest business, is attempting to up-end how we pay for things at coffee shops, stores, and everywhere else, and the potential benefits for businesses are huge:

Money is a concept that’s been with us for 5,000 years, and it’s never been designed to be anything but a burden. You come into my coffee store and order a cappuccino, and I hit the Cappuccino button on the cash register and see that it’s $3.24. And I take your credit card and type “$3.24″ into the credit card terminal. I swipe your card and give you the credit card receipt to sign. Then I take that back and staple it to the cash register receipt and give it back to you, along with your credit card. Then you take back the credit card and throw the receipts away. And meanwhile, at the end of the day I have no idea how many cappuccinos I sold because it’s really difficult to access that information. It’s completely useless.

Over the course of the interview, Dorsey gets into exactly how broken the credit card industry is today. What Square is trying to do is make payment easier and faster, and provide businesses with both an easier way to get started, and a treasure trove of data that can help them do their business better. It’s a bold industry to try and get into, with established players that aren’t going to give in easily, but I hope Square at least makes enough of a splash to make Visa or Discover think differently about how they do business.

I’ve been writing about this for a while now, and I’m more excited than ever. Square was, after all, the only review I’ve ever written for PCMag that let me expense a cup of coffee right outside my office.

What Flying Will be Like in 2050

The Guardian looks at an Airbus concept of a plane in 2050, which includes things like a golf course, vitamin-enriched air, and panoramic views for every single passenger:

The concept cabin for travellers in 2050 would be a bionic structure that mimics the efficiency of bird bone.

It would provide strength where needed, and also allows for an “intelligent” cabin wall membrane which controls air temperature and can become transparent to give passengers open, panoramic views.

The cabin would have seats that fit passengers’ body shapes and travellers might be able to read bedtime stories to their children back home, Airbus said.

Hit the Guardian’s slideshow for more photos. It looks like flying’s not going to suck in 39 years.